.png)
Women in Germany Are Rising Up Against Digital Sexual Violence
A new feminist movement is gaining attention in Germany — and this time, one of its biggest targets is not happening on the street. It is happening online. Across Germany, women and activists are demanding stronger protection against sexualised digital violence, particularly the growing use of artificial intelligence to create fake sexual images and videos of women without their consent. The debate has intensified in 2026 as a high-profile case involving German actor and presenter Collien Fernandes brought renewed attention to the issue. Fernandes has alleged that AI-generated pornographic images and videos falsely depicting her were circulated online. Her former husband, television presenter Christian Ulmen, has denied the allegations through his lawyer. The legal and public debate surrounding the case remains ongoing. For many campaigners, however, the issue extends far beyond one celebrity case. It is about what happens when technology becomes capable of manufacturing sexual abuse at scale.
When AI Becomes a Tool for Digital Violence
Artificial intelligence has made image and video manipulation increasingly accessible. A person's face can be placed into an entirely fabricated scene, creating an image that may look convincing to people who see it online. The person depicted may never have participated in the image at all. This is particularly concerning when the manipulated content is sexual. Germany's Federal Justice Minister Stefanie Hubig has described pornographic deepfakes as a major problem and said existing German criminal law has significant gaps when it comes to the creation and distribution of such material. The government has been working on legislation intended to strengthen protection against digital violence. The technology is moving quickly.
The law is trying to catch up.
The Case That Sparked Wider Anger
The controversy surrounding Collien Fernandes became a catalyst for a much broader discussion.
Fernandes has spoken publicly about alleged sexualised digital abuse and has called attention to the impact that manipulated material can have on women. The case also prompted public demonstrations and renewed pressure on German politicians to strengthen protections against digital sexual violence. Reuters reported that a demonstration in Berlin drew around 10,000 people in March 2026. The story resonated because activists argue that digitally manufactured sexual content should not be treated as harmless simply because the images are fake. For the person whose identity is used, the consequences can still be real.
Reputation can be damaged. Images can spread beyond the victim's control.
Personal relationships can be affected. And removing content from the internet can be extremely difficult once it has been copied and redistributed.
Why Women Are Calling for Change
Women's organisations and legal experts have argued that Germany's existing laws do not comprehensively address the newest forms of image-based sexual abuse.
The German Women's Council said in May 2026 that sexualised deepfakes, rape-related online content, secret digital tracking and sexualised cyberbullying particularly affect women and girls. It warned that digital violence can also discourage women and girls from participating fully in public digital life. The German Association of Women Lawyers has similarly called for reforms covering criminal law, civil-law remedies, platform responsibility and the obligations of AI providers. The message from campaigners is straightforward:
"What is considered abuse offline should not become acceptable simply because it happens through a screen"
Germany's Legal Debate
The question has now moved into Germany's political and legal institutions. In March, the Bundestag debated legislation concerning image-based sexualised violence. One proposal sought to broaden criminal protections so that non-consensual sexualised images — including digitally manipulated or artificially generated images — would be covered more comprehensively. The German government has also discussed new provisions that could address manipulated content, digital surveillance and other forms of technology-enabled abuse.
Proposed changes have included expanding existing provisions concerning intimate images and creating a new criminal offence relating to the unauthorised distribution of certain AI-generated or manipulated content.
But legislation is only one part of the problem. Enforcement, platform responsibility and the ability of victims to identify perpetrators remain important questions.
The “Only Yes Means Yes” Debate
The movement has also reopened a broader discussion about sexual consent in Germany.
Campaigners have questioned whether existing laws sufficiently reflect the principle that sexual activity requires clear consent. Germany's debate therefore extends beyond AI. It connects digital abuse with a larger conversation about sexual autonomy, consent and women's safety. Deutsche Welle reported that activists were pushing for Germany to reconsider aspects of its rape law and move toward an “only yes means yes” approach to consent. The discussion illustrates how one technology issue can expose much older questions about power, consent and equality.
The German debate matters far beyond Germany. AI-generated sexual content does not respect national borders. A manipulated image created in one country can be uploaded to a platform, copied by another user and viewed around the world within minutes.
That means the questions being asked by women in Germany are likely to appear elsewhere too.
Who is responsible when AI creates abusive content?
Should creating a sexual deepfake be a crime?
How quickly should platforms remove it?
How can victims identify those responsible?
And how can the law protect people when technology changes faster than legislation?
Germany's women's movement is putting those questions firmly on the public agenda.
The technology may be new. The demand for consent, dignity and protection is not.
Comments